Preliminary Final Report/Media Release/Financial Statements
Document date:
Thu 25 Oct 2001
Published:
Thu 25 Oct 2001 11:25:18
Document No:
182866
Document part:
G
Market Flag:
Y
Classification:
Preliminary Final Report
,
Full Year Accounts
,
Dividend Record Date
,
Dividend Pay Date
,
Dividend Rate
AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP 2001-10-25 ASX-SIGNAL-G HOMEX - Melbourne +++++++++++++++++++++++++ CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S REVIEW OVERVIEW Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) recorded a profit after tax, of $1,870 million for the year ended 30 September 2001. Earnings per ordinary share were 117.4 cents, an increase of 10%. Return on ordinary shareholders' equity was 20.2%, achieving our target of above 20% for the first time in 20 years. The Group's continuing operations recorded a profit $1,882 million, up 18% over the September 2000 year. The Group's divestment of the Grindlays businesses in 2000 has allowed management to focus on growing the core banking franchises in Australia and New Zealand and to explore opportunities in significant trading areas of Asia and the Pacific region. On 8 October 2001, the Group announced the purchase from Bank of Hawaii of operations in PNG, Fiji and Vanuatu, subject to regulatory approval. Balance sheet growth has been deliberately constrained by limiting growth in corporate lending to focus more on fee income and by securitisation of mortgage assets Income from continuing operations grew 11%. Despite salary rises and general price rises in the order of 3% to 4%, costs were flat after deducting GST ($52 million), expenses incurred by new acquisitions ($24 million) and the effect of the exchange rate movements ($33 million) The cost income ratio from the continuing operations reduced to 48.4% from 51.8%, reflecting income growth and the results of our continuing focus on efficiency initiatives. This result represents further progress towards the Group's aim of a cost income ratio in the mid 40's. Whilst payments and processing systems were not interrupted by the terrorist attacks in the USA on 11 September 2001, the credit outlook for specific industry segments of the Group's loan portfolio has been adversely impacted. As a result an additional economic loss provision (ELP) of $41 million has been charged in the second half in response to the estimated impact on the Group's risk grade profile which is used to derive ELP. During the year, there were a number of high profile corporate failures in Australia, with new specific provisions of $153 million attributed to two corporate accounts. The Group has made prudent specific provisions for the potential losses from corporate failures. Profit after tax benefited by $36 million from the 2% drop in the Australian corporate tax rate. The following commentary compares the results of continuing operations in the current half-year with the March 2001 half-year (refer table on page 2). INCOME Net interest income at $1,945 million was 5% higher, through volume growth, with overall net margin stable. Non-interest income grew by 5% to $1,350 million. Fee income grew by 6%, continuing the growth achieved in the first half. Other income was 3% higher, with increases in life insurance margin on services operating income, and in income from hedging activities, offset by the absence of several one-off items in the first half. EXPENSES Operating expenses were well contained, being flat after deducting the $4 million increase in costs from our acquisition of Amerika Samoa Bank, start up operations in East Timor and exchange rate impacts. This reflected the continuing success of our cost management and restructuring initiatives. Our focus is on continuing to reduce the cost income ratio to the mid 40's within two years, whilst selectively investing for growth. RESTRUCTUING INITIATIVES Significant infrastructure and technology projects are underway across the Group. These projects generally deliver efficiencies of operation and in some cases also enhance income generating capabilities. Restructuring costs arising as a result of these projects are taken against the provision raised at September 2000. Usage against this provision in the current half year was $117 million ($65 million first half). In addition, normal restructuring activities resulted in a charge to profit of $42 million ($43 million first half). Progress on projects includes: * the focus on branch reconfiguration has been slower than expected, as the Group rebalances its focus on cost reduction with an increasing emphasis on revenue growth and customer service through transforming the branch environment as a strategic asset * progress on our new sales and service platform continues * the roll-out of chip enabled EFTPOS devices and write off of existing terminals * Esanda back office processes are progressively moving towards web based platforms and the business finance stream has been restructured * re-configuration of sales platforms in the Asia and Pacific businesses, with operational enhancements to credit approval and review processes * outsourcing of trade back office processing to a joint venture operation, giving significant efficiencies and greater customer functionality * the decommissioning of legacy IT platforms, workflow improvements, the replacement of the older transaction processing systems and hardware upgrades are on schedule. The rollout of the Common Administration Systems platform has commenced with the technical infrastructure, phase 1 of the Human Resources module and the Procurement, Accounts Payable and Fixed Assets modules already implemented. Further phases (the rollout of the General Ledger replacement and Human Resources phase 2) are on schedule for implementation during next financial year * write off of surplus lease space, fitout and other assets The benefits of this extensive restructuring program will emerge progressively, but principally in 2002 and beyond. These savings will be used to maintain our philosophy of cost control and to enable investment in growth options, whilst achieving our target of a mid 40's cost income ratio. RISK The Group provision for doubtful debts in the second half was $290 million, compared with $241 million in the first half. The increase in the economic loss provisioning in the second half reflected a somewhat harsher economic environment, but principally the assessed impact on credit outlook of the terrorist attacks in the USA. Given the close proximity of the terrorist attacks to balance date, the Group has conducted an analysis that estimates the potential impact on economic loss provisioning. The analysis notionally downgraded, by one credit risk rating, all exposures to the tourism, airline and insurance industries, and exposures to the Middle East. All other loan assets were notionally given a 10% increase in their expected default frequency. The changed rating profile has resulted in an additional charge of $41 million, which was recognised centrally because of the close proximity to balance date. Risk profiles continue to be closely monitored. Net specific provision were $339 million, up from $181 million in the first half. Tightening credit conditions were also evident in the consumer portfolio and Asset Based Finance. Net non-accrual loans increased from $727 million at March 2001 to $770 million at September 2001. Gross non-accrual loans and specific provision balances fell due to significant write-offs and the sale of non-accrual portfolios. The general provision balance at September 2000 was $1,386 million, compared with $1,460 million at March 2001. The Group continues to re-balance its lending portfolio, with consumer lending in Australia and New Zealand moving from 52% of net advances in September 2000 to 55% at 30 September 2001. Single customer concentration limits continue to be set well below APRA guidelines and were reduced between 20% and 40% during the half. These broad portfolio measures, together with the focus on lowering the risk in the portfolio and industry diversification across corporate lending (refer page 58), should place the Group in a sound position in the harsher economic conditions that are expected. DISCONTINUED BUSINESSES Discontinued businesses comprise principally residual assets from the Grindlays operations sold on 31 July 2000 and the joint venture with OCBC Bank discontinued in March 2001. These businesses broke even in the second half, compared with a loss of $12 million in the March 2001 half-year. SECURITISATION OF ASSETS During the current half-year, $1.97 billion (USD $1 billion) mortgage assets were securitised through an issue into the global market. The issue was three times over-subscribed. ANZ retains responsibility for the servicing and management of the loans. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Inner Tier 1 and Tier 1 ratios have been maintained at levels similar to those at September 2000. The ratios were managed down in the first half of 2001 through the share buy-back program, the final part of which was completed in May 2001. Both ratios showed a small increase in the second half, to 6.4% and 7.5% respectively. the long term target for Inner Tier 1 remains at 6.0%. The Group's total capital adequacy ratio remains strong at 10.3%. The Group is managed to maximise value for our shareholders. One measure of shareholder value is EVA(TM) (Economic Value Added) growth relative to prior periods. EVA(TM) for the half-year ended 30 September 2001 was $681 million, up from $594 million for the half-year ended 31 March 2001. EVA(TM) is a measure of risk adjusted accounting profit. It is based on operating profit after tax, adjusted for one-off items, the cost of capital, imputation credits and economic capital at a rate of 11%. At ANZ, economic capital is the equity allocated according to a business unit's inherent risk profile. It is allocated for several risk categories including: credit risk, operating risk, interest rate risk, basis risk, mismatch risk, investment risk, trading risk and other risk. The methodology used to allocated capital to business units for risk is designed to help drive appropriate risk management strategies throughout the Group. EVA(TM) is a key measure for evaluating business unit performance and correspondingly is a key factor in determining the variable component of remuneration packages. business unit results are equity standardised, by eliminating the impact of earnings on each business unit's book capital and attributing earnings on the business unit's risk adjusted or economic capital. MORE TO FOLLOW

