Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing at a pace that is becoming hard to overstate. It is reshaping how we work, how we communicate and make decisions, and this is only the beginning. AI is increasingly being used to expand its own capabilities, indicating its development is only going to accelerate.
Time will tell which science fiction movie or which book got the future right. Perhaps the machines will prove less Skynet and more "Marvin the Paranoid Android".
Right now, the more immediate risk is that we simply start believing everything AI tells us. Apparently, half of us are already using AI to guide financial decisions, according to a global EY study.
Ask an AI platform like ChatGPT whether a stock is a good investment, what is the best ETF or how to reduce risk in your portfolio, and an answer arrives almost instantly. It is neatly structured, appears reasoned, and is accompanied by a range of supposedly reliable sources. And you can get it for free.
AI is rapidly becoming an important tool in the investor’s kit. The likes of ChatGPT, Claude or Grok (AI platforms known as Large Language Models or LLMs) can rapidly digest financial reports, explain investment concepts, compare funds, examine economic scenarios and process quantities of information that are beyond the capability of any human.
Used well, it could make investors better informed and unlock opportunities. Used poorly, it could make them confidently wrong.
The incredible efficiency AI can provide is a clear benefit to investors in terms of time, effort, and cost savings. The sheer volume of information and data that can now be analysed, distilled and turned into comprehensible, actionable responses gives the everyday investor access to a level of expertise and processing power that was previously unimaginable.
The possibilities are endless. For example, investors can:
Many investors are already embedding AI into their investment process, using it as a co-pilot, and an always-on adviser to inform and guide portfolio management.
Is this the end for the financial adviser? Probably not.
When a group of academics from MIT Sloan conducted research into the financial advice LLMs were providing, they were surprised. The financial guidance produced by LLMs was better than they had expected, regardless of whether the prompts came from ordinary users or academics.
The models tended to encourage higher savings, greater participation in the sharemarket, better portfolio diversification, and levels of risk that were more appropriate to an investor's age.
But the LLMs struggled with nuance. The quality of the advice depended heavily on the quality of the prompt. This presents a quandary. To access quality financial outputs from AI, the user must already have sufficient financial knowledge to not only know what’s important and how to ask it but also know enough to interrogate the answers and check their veracity.
There is no absolute way to invest, and no single investment strategy or piece of advice will suit every investor.
Two intelligent investors can examine the same company, study the same financial statements and reach opposite conclusions. One may see an undervalued business. Another may see a business whose best years are behind it.
However, regardless of the complexity of the question, LLMs deliver clear, confident answers. They present information as correct, even when it is not.
It’s called a “hallucination” when an AI model generates information that appears plausible but is inaccurate or invented. But with investing, there is an added complication. An answer can contain completely accurate information and still lead to a poor investment decision.
Across the LLM landscape, the most cited source is Reddit - a website built on user-generated content, opinion and community voting. According to Contently’s analysis, LinkedIn, YouTube, Wikipedia, and “Forbes and editorial publications” round out the top five most cited domains. Most of these sites would not normally make the list for providing accurate, objective investment information.
The bigger risk, however, is not that AI gets it wrong, but that we become less inclined to question it.
Wharton academics recently released a paper that brings Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman’s work in Thinking, Fast and Slow into the AI era. The study introduced the concept of ‘cognitive surrender’, which is the tendency of humans to accept AI-generated answers with minimal critical oversight.
The researchers found that even when the AI was giving wrong answers roughly half the time, participants’ confidence in their responses went up.
In markets, where certainty is already scarce, that confidence can be a particular risk.
Humans, of course, also have shortcomings when it comes to investing.
Our behavioural biases are well documented. We have tendencies to put more value on recent performance (recency bias), seek information that confirms what we already believe (confirmation bias), and can fall in love with a strategy or stock, resulting in not selling out despite it being in our best interests.
An algorithm has no sentimental attachment to the shares it bought last year. It does not panic because the market has fallen 5% in a day.
This is one of the reasons ETFs have become so popular. Being rules-based, ETFs provide access to a range of investment strategies – many previously only accessible by institutional investors – while removing emotion from the management of the fund. AI extends that capability.
The next evolution of investing is harnessing this computing power, data analysis and machine learning to build dynamic portfolios. This is not about asking a standard LLM which stocks to buy. It is about institutional-grade, purpose-built AI models designed to identify stocks according to defined investment learning, parameters, and adapting as they process new information.
And this technology is already on ASX, with the first AI-powered ETF launched this year. Like every other sector, AI will continue to transform the way we invest.
But AI alone will not be a differentiator. Just as with LLMs, the quality of the output is only as good as the inputs, frameworks and expertise behind it. The investment edge will therefore belong not simply to those with access to the most powerful models, but to those who combine them with the deepest investment expertise.
The ASX Investment Products monthly report provides information on the latest ETFs and other listed funds.
DISCLAIMER
Any views expressed are opinions of the author at the time of writing and are not a recommendation to act.
VanEck Investments Limited (ACN 146 596 116 AFSL 416755) (VanEck) is the issuer and responsible entity of all VanEck exchange traded funds (Funds) trading on ASX. This information is not personal advice and is general in nature, and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. The product disclosure statement (PDS) and the target market determination (TMD) for all Funds are available at vaneck.com.au. You should consider whether or not an investment in any Fund is appropriate for you. Investments in a Fund involve risks associated with financial markets. These risks vary depending on a Fund’s investment objective. Refer to the applicable PDS and TMD for more details on risks. Investment returns and capital are not guaranteed.
The views, opinions or recommendations of the author in this article are solely those of the author and do not in any way reflect the views, opinions, recommendations of ASX Limited ABN 98 008 624 691 and its related bodies corporate (“ASX”). ASX makes no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the content. The content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Independent advice should be obtained from an Australian financial services licensee before making investment decisions. To the extent permitted by law, ASX excludes all liability for any loss or damage arising in any way due to or in connection with the publication of this article, including by way of negligence.
Don’t miss the latest insights from ASX Investor Update on LinkedIn
The views, opinions or recommendations of the author in this article are solely those of the author and do not in any way reflect the views, opinions, recommendations, of ASX Limited ABN 98 008 624 691 and its related bodies corporate (“ASX”). ASX makes no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the content. The content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Independent advice should be obtained from an Australian financial services licensee before making investment decisions. To the extent permitted by law, ASX excludes all liability for any loss or damage arising in any way due to or in connection with the publication of this article, including by way of negligence.